Triple

T2653750
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ollie’s Barbecue purchased a substantial portion of its food from out-of-state suppliers E53958 entity
Predicate isDiscussedIn P5301 FINISHED
Object the majority opinion in Katzenbach v. McClung E9688 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: the majority opinion in Katzenbach v. McClung | Statement: [Ollie’s Barbecue purchased a substantial portion of its food from out-of-state suppliers, isDiscussedIn, the majority opinion in Katzenbach v. McClung]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: the majority opinion in Katzenbach v. McClung
Context triple: [Ollie’s Barbecue purchased a substantial portion of its food from out-of-state suppliers, isDiscussedIn, the majority opinion in Katzenbach v. McClung]
  • A. Katzenbach v. McClung chosen
    Katzenbach v. McClung is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in local restaurants under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
  • B. Katzenbach v. Morgan
    Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
  • C. South Carolina v. Katzenbach
    South Carolina v. Katzenbach is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, affirming broad federal power to combat racial discrimination in voting.
  • D. Reynolds v. Sims decision
    The Reynolds v. Sims decision is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that established the “one person, one vote” principle by requiring state legislative districts to be roughly equal in population under the Equal Protection Clause.
  • E. Employment Division v. Smith
    Employment Division v. Smith is a landmark 1990 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed protections for religious practices under the Free Exercise Clause by upholding the enforcement of neutral, generally applicable laws even when they incidentally burden religion.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab495e192081909c77b622e8e7e15a completed March 6, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abd932a35881909568839589f12062 completed March 7, 2026, 7:52 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69afce812640819085c46f7452b5913b completed March 10, 2026, 7:55 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:53 p.m.