Triple
T2653734
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ollie’s Barbecue purchased a substantial portion of its food from out-of-state suppliers |
E53958
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsFinding |
P41968
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ollie’s Barbecue was engaged in interstate commerce |
E53956
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ollie’s Barbecue was engaged in interstate commerce | Statement: [Ollie’s Barbecue purchased a substantial portion of its food from out-of-state suppliers, supportsFinding, Ollie’s Barbecue was engaged in interstate commerce]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ollie’s Barbecue was engaged in interstate commerce Context triple: [Ollie’s Barbecue purchased a substantial portion of its food from out-of-state suppliers, supportsFinding, Ollie’s Barbecue was engaged in interstate commerce]
-
A.
Ollie’s Barbecue case
The Ollie’s Barbecue case refers to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Katzenbach v. McClung (1964), which upheld the application of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to a local restaurant under the Commerce Clause, reinforcing federal power to prohibit racial discrimination in public accommodations.
-
B.
Ollie’s Barbecue purchased a substantial portion of its food from out-of-state suppliers
Ollie’s Barbecue was a small, family-owned Birmingham, Alabama restaurant whose reliance on out-of-state food supplies became central to the Supreme Court’s Commerce Clause analysis in Katzenbach v. McClung.
-
C.
Ollie’s Barbecue
chosen
Ollie’s Barbecue was a family-owned Birmingham, Alabama restaurant whose racially discriminatory service practices led to the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Katzenbach v. McClung on the scope of federal civil rights law under the Commerce Clause.
-
D.
Ollie’s Barbecue refused to serve Black customers in its dining area
Ollie’s Barbecue refused to serve Black customers in its dining area, making it a central example of racial discrimination in public accommodations challenged in the Supreme Court case Katzenbach v. McClung.
-
E.
Barbecue Capital of the World
Barbecue Capital of the World is a nickname celebrating Lexington, North Carolina’s famed tradition of slow-cooked, wood-smoked pork barbecue and its central place in American barbecue culture.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsFinding Context triple: [Ollie’s Barbecue purchased a substantial portion of its food from out-of-state suppliers, supportsFinding, Ollie’s Barbecue was engaged in interstate commerce]
-
A.
containsFinding
Indicates that one entity includes, encompasses, or holds a particular finding as part of its content or results.
-
B.
requiresFinding
Indicates that one entity’s validity, execution, or completion is contingent upon a specific finding or determination being made about another entity.
-
C.
finds
Indicates that one entity discovers, locates, or comes upon another entity, often as the result of a search or encounter.
-
D.
supportsUse
Indicates that one entity enables, allows, or is compatible with the use or operation of another entity.
-
E.
support
Indicates that one entity provides assistance, endorsement, or backing to another entity or its actions.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab495e192081909c77b622e8e7e15a |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abda0ba2208190ad87763ecbef8c3c |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69af98d0dbd08190a317dfe1844840c5 |
completed | March 10, 2026, 4:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd815d06481909535c02b0aba8553 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abda0a13308190a986df86270258a7 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:53 p.m.