Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Katzenbach v. McClung | Statement: [Ollie’s Barbecue purchased a substantial portion of its food from out-of-state suppliers, isRelevantToCase, Katzenbach v. McClung]

Target entity: Katzenbach v. McClung
Context triple: [Ollie’s Barbecue purchased a substantial portion of its food from out-of-state suppliers, isRelevantToCase, Katzenbach v. McClung]

• A. Katzenbach v. McClung chosen
  Katzenbach v. McClung is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in local restaurants under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
• B. Katzenbach v. Morgan
  Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
• C. South Carolina v. Katzenbach
  South Carolina v. Katzenbach is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, affirming broad federal power to combat racial discrimination in voting.
• D. Bolling v. Sharpe
  Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
• E. Craig v. Boren
  Craig v. Boren is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that established intermediate scrutiny as the standard for evaluating gender-based classifications under the Equal Protection Clause.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: isRelevantToCase
Context triple: [Ollie’s Barbecue purchased a substantial portion of its food from out-of-state suppliers, isRelevantToCase, Katzenbach v. McClung]

• A. relatedCase
  Indicates that one legal case is connected or associated with another case, such as through shared facts, parties, issues, or procedural history.
• B. associatedCourtCase chosen
  Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked to, or involved in, a particular court case.
• C. associatedWithCourt
  Indicates a relationship in which an entity is linked or connected to a specific court, such as through jurisdiction, affiliation, or involvement in legal proceedings.
• D. legalCaseOutcomeAssociatedWith
  Indicates that a particular legal case outcome is connected or linked to a specific related entity, such as a case, party, or legal proceeding.
• E. affectedCourt
  Indicates that a particular court is impacted or influenced by a specified action, decision, or legal matter.
• F. None of above.