Triple
T2653675
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ollie’s Barbecue |
E53956
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalPrecedentFor |
P18766
|
FINISHED |
| Object | federal regulation of discriminatory practices in small, local businesses tied to interstate commerce |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: federal regulation of discriminatory practices in small, local businesses tied to interstate commerce | Statement: [Ollie’s Barbecue, legalPrecedentFor, federal regulation of discriminatory practices in small, local businesses tied to interstate commerce]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalPrecedentFor Context triple: [Ollie’s Barbecue, legalPrecedentFor, federal regulation of discriminatory practices in small, local businesses tied to interstate commerce]
-
A.
hasCourtPrecedence
chosen
Indicates that one court decision or ruling holds authoritative priority over another in legal reasoning or application.
-
B.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
-
C.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
D.
precedentInterpreted
Indicates that one legal precedent is interpreted or understood in a particular way, often as clarified or applied in subsequent decisions or analyses.
-
E.
legalCitation
Indicates that one legal document, case, or authority formally references or cites another as a source of legal support or precedent.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab495e192081909c77b622e8e7e15a |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abda0ba2208190ad87763ecbef8c3c |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd815d06481909535c02b0aba8553 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:53 p.m.