Triple
T2653660
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ollie’s Barbecue |
E53956
|
entity |
| Predicate | SupremeCourtHoldingEffect |
P12285
|
FINISHED |
| Object | subject to federal regulation under the Commerce Clause |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: subject to federal regulation under the Commerce Clause | Statement: [Ollie’s Barbecue, SupremeCourtHoldingEffect, subject to federal regulation under the Commerce Clause]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: SupremeCourtHoldingEffect Context triple: [Ollie’s Barbecue, SupremeCourtHoldingEffect, subject to federal regulation under the Commerce Clause]
-
A.
SupremeCourtEffect
chosen
Indicates that an action, decision, or condition has an effect that is determined by, derived from, or constrained by the rulings or authority of a supreme court.
-
B.
courtInfluence
Indicates that one party exerts or holds influence over decisions, outcomes, or behavior within a court or judicial setting.
-
C.
influencedCourtDecision
Indicates that one entity had an effect on or contributed to the outcome of a court’s decision regarding another entity or matter.
-
D.
supremeCourtService
Indicates that an entity serves or has served as a member (e.g., justice or judge) on a supreme court.
-
E.
supremeCourtUseFrom
Indicates that a decision, precedent, or legal principle is utilized or drawn upon by a supreme court from a particular source.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab495e192081909c77b622e8e7e15a |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abda0ba2208190ad87763ecbef8c3c |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd815d06481909535c02b0aba8553 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:53 p.m.