Triple
T26535230
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tuas Checkpoint |
E671225
|
entity |
| Predicate | connectedStructure |
P62922
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Second Link bridge |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Second Link bridge | Statement: [Tuas Checkpoint, connectedStructure, Second Link bridge]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: connectedStructure Context triple: [Tuas Checkpoint, connectedStructure, Second Link bridge]
-
A.
linkedByStructure
chosen
Indicates that two entities are connected or associated through a shared structural element, configuration, or framework.
-
B.
integratedStructure
Indicates that multiple components are combined into a single, cohesive structure that functions as an integrated whole.
-
C.
associatesStructure
Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked or connected to a particular structure, typically to denote that the structure is relevant, attached, or functionally associated with it.
-
D.
viaStructure
Indicates that one entity is connected to or accessed through a particular structural element or medium.
-
E.
branchStructure
Indicates how the parts of a branching system are organized and connected relative to one another.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eeb3206e748190b90c85cc81f38c91 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7626667f48190ad90867eb67ec582 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f76175d6608190b60b268e20f49ed9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:53 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:38 a.m.