Triple
T26531929
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nomascus leucogenys |
E670840
|
entity |
| Predicate | pairBondingBehavior |
P8592
|
FINISHED |
| Object | vocal duets |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: vocal duets | Statement: [Nomascus leucogenys, pairBondingBehavior, vocal duets]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: pairBondingBehavior Context triple: [Nomascus leucogenys, pairBondingBehavior, vocal duets]
-
A.
pairBond
Indicates a long-term, typically exclusive social or reproductive partnership formed between two individuals.
-
B.
bondedWith
Indicates that two entities are joined by a strong, enduring connection or attachment, whether emotional, social, or structural.
-
C.
bondedWithSpecies
Indicates a relationship where an entity has formed a close, enduring bond or attachment with a particular species.
-
D.
reproductiveBehavior
chosen
Indicates the actions, strategies, and interactions involved in an organism’s mating and reproduction processes.
-
E.
typicalBonding
Indicates a usual or characteristic bonding relationship that commonly occurs between the involved entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eeb31ea1e08190b9ff43cf9bc25bf8 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f613f84cdc8190828985c94d8491d5 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f602d7b1b0819095ddd3b5169f8ce2 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:36 a.m.