Triple
T26529638
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | B1061 |
E670783
|
entity |
| Predicate | customerForMission |
P162340
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Nilesat |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Nilesat | Statement: [B1061, customerForMission, Nilesat]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: customerForMission Context triple: [B1061, customerForMission, Nilesat]
-
A.
clientOf
Indicates that one entity receives services or conducts business from another entity in a client–provider relationship.
-
B.
isTargetOfMission
Indicates that an entity is the intended objective or focus of a particular mission or operation.
-
C.
participantCustom
Indicates that an entity participates in an event, activity, or process in a role or manner that is defined in a customized or non-standard way.
-
D.
customerType
Indicates the classification or category assigned to a customer based on their characteristics, status, or relationship with a business.
-
E.
customerGroup
Indicates a relationship in which an entity belongs to, is classified under, or is associated with a particular group of customers.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eeb31ea1e08190b9ff43cf9bc25bf8 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6250321088190ae3ed1dc9f2fcd03 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f623a7539c8190b71797f583da9f63 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f62473a38481909b919f88ffb5b492 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:21 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:34 a.m.