Triple

T26529058
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Vere languores nostros E670768 entity
Predicate sungText P134835 FINISHED
Object Vere languores nostros ipse tulit LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Vere languores nostros ipse tulit | Statement: [Vere languores nostros, sungText, Vere languores nostros ipse tulit]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sungText
Context triple: [Vere languores nostros, sungText, Vere languores nostros ipse tulit]
  • A. sungIn
    Indicates that something (such as a song, lyric, or performance) is performed vocally using a particular language, style, or vocal context.
  • B. sungAs
    Indicates that something is performed or vocalized in the manner, role, or identity specified by another entity (e.g., a song or part being sung as a particular character, style, or version).
  • C. lyricText chosen
    Indicates that one entity is the lyrical content or words of a song or musical piece associated with another entity.
  • D. textBy
    Indicates that a given text or written content was authored or produced by a particular entity.
  • E. vocalText
    Indicates that an entity produces or is associated with spoken or sung textual content.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eeb31ea1e08190b9ff43cf9bc25bf8 completed April 27, 2026, 12:51 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f613f5ec28819099ec679f636d61d9 completed May 2, 2026, 3:10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f602d7b1b0819095ddd3b5169f8ce2 completed May 2, 2026, 1:57 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:34 a.m.