Triple

T2652727
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Origination Clause E53936 entity
Predicate hasBeenLitigatedIn P3010 FINISHED
Object United States v. Munoz-Flores
United States v. Munoz-Flores is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether a federal statute imposing monetary assessments on convicted offenders violated the Constitution’s Origination Clause.
E285905 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (5 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. Munoz-Flores | Statement: [Origination Clause, hasBeenLitigatedIn, United States v. Munoz-Flores]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Munoz-Flores
Context triple: [Origination Clause, hasBeenLitigatedIn, United States v. Munoz-Flores]
  • A. United States v. Eichman
    United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
  • B. United States v. Leon
    United States v. Leon is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the "good faith" exception to the exclusionary rule in Fourth Amendment search and seizure cases.
  • C. United States v. Guest
    United States v. Guest is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the federal government can prosecute private conspiracies to interfere with constitutional rights, particularly the right to travel, under certain circumstances.
  • D. Escobedo v. Illinois
    Escobedo v. Illinois is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that expanded the Sixth Amendment right to counsel during police interrogations and helped lay the groundwork for the later Miranda warnings.
  • E. United States v. Gratiot
    United States v. Gratiot is an 1840 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld broad federal authority over public lands under the Constitution’s Property Clause.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: United States v. Munoz-Flores
Triple: [Origination Clause, hasBeenLitigatedIn, United States v. Munoz-Flores]
Generated description
United States v. Munoz-Flores is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether a federal statute imposing monetary assessments on convicted offenders violated the Constitution’s Origination Clause.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Munoz-Flores
Target entity description: United States v. Munoz-Flores is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether a federal statute imposing monetary assessments on convicted offenders violated the Constitution’s Origination Clause.
  • A. United States v. Eichman
    United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
  • B. United States v. Leon
    United States v. Leon is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the "good faith" exception to the exclusionary rule in Fourth Amendment search and seizure cases.
  • C. United States v. Guest
    United States v. Guest is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the federal government can prosecute private conspiracies to interfere with constitutional rights, particularly the right to travel, under certain circumstances.
  • D. Escobedo v. Illinois
    Escobedo v. Illinois is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that expanded the Sixth Amendment right to counsel during police interrogations and helped lay the groundwork for the later Miranda warnings.
  • E. United States v. Gratiot
    United States v. Gratiot is an 1840 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld broad federal authority over public lands under the Constitution’s Property Clause.
  • F. None of above. chosen
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasBeenLitigatedIn
Context triple: [Origination Clause, hasBeenLitigatedIn, United States v. Munoz-Flores]
  • A. hasLegalProceeding chosen
    Indicates that there is a formal legal action, case, or proceeding involving the related entities.
  • B. litigates
    Indicates that one party engages in legal action or conducts a lawsuit against or involving another party.
  • C. litigationType
    Indicates the specific category or nature of a legal dispute or court case associated with an entity or event.
  • D. disputeInvolves
    Indicates that a particular dispute includes or concerns the specified entities as participants or parties to the conflict.
  • E. legalCase
    Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (6 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab495e192081909c77b622e8e7e15a completed March 6, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abda0ba2208190ad87763ecbef8c3c completed March 7, 2026, 7:55 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69af98ce81fc8190b7c6c66acfcb87c7 completed March 10, 2026, 4:06 a.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_69af99416924819099d4acb1a2d60e0c completed March 10, 2026, 4:08 a.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_69af99adadb08190a44f2286b25bf0aa completed March 10, 2026, 4:10 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abd815d06481909535c02b0aba8553 completed March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:53 p.m.