Triple
T26518792
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | McConnell v. Federal Election Commission |
E669893
|
entity |
| Predicate | upheldConstitutionalityOf |
P1123
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act electioneering communications provisions |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act electioneering communications provisions | Statement: [McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, upheldConstitutionalityOf, Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act electioneering communications provisions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: upheldConstitutionalityOf Context triple: [McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, upheldConstitutionalityOf, Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act electioneering communications provisions]
-
A.
upheldBy
chosen
Indicates that one entity is supported, maintained, or validated by another, often through approval, enforcement, or confirmation of its validity.
-
B.
declaredUnconstitutionalInCase
Indicates that a law, policy, or action was ruled unconstitutional in a specific legal case.
-
C.
yearDeclaredUnconstitutional
Indicates the specific year in which a law, policy, or legal provision was officially ruled unconstitutional.
-
D.
constitutionalBasisOfHolding
Indicates that one legal holding is grounded in, justified by, or derived from a specific constitutional provision or principle.
-
E.
servedUnderConstitution
Indicates that an individual held an official position or exercised authority while a specific constitution was in force and governing their role.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eeb31b6dcc8190b30632dc3928a0c0 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f613c06530819095609b53dda121b4 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:09 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f60b89cc048190a9feb24466006be0 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:25 a.m.