Triple
T26506503
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Canton of Glarus |
E669560
|
entity |
| Predicate | reformedMunicipalStructure |
P38054
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2011 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2011 | Statement: [Canton of Glarus, reformedMunicipalStructure, 2011]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reformedMunicipalStructure Context triple: [Canton of Glarus, reformedMunicipalStructure, 2011]
-
A.
municipalityReform
chosen
Indicates a formal reorganization or restructuring of a municipality’s administrative boundaries, governance, or status.
-
B.
municipalReformFramework
Indicates a framework that defines how municipal governance structures, powers, and processes are reorganized or improved through reform measures.
-
C.
reconstitutedAsMunicipality
Indicates that an entity which previously lost or changed its municipal status has been formally re-established or reorganized as a municipality.
-
D.
governmentalBodyReformed
Indicates that an existing governmental body has been reorganized, restructured, or otherwise formally reformed.
-
E.
stanceOnLocalGovernanceReform
Indicates an entity’s expressed position, attitude, or policy preference regarding proposed or ongoing reforms to local governance structures, powers, or processes.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eeb319ec70819090834c2591cf5f1e |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6138e8f508190898b55c271967d95 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:09 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f602d5c8808190a1fdbebd6f0981e8 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:17 a.m.