Triple

T26499934
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Biswambhar Roy E669389 entity
Predicate personalTragedy P41242 FINISHED
Object financial ruin LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: financial ruin | Statement: [Biswambhar Roy, personalTragedy, financial ruin]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: personalTragedy
Context triple: [Biswambhar Roy, personalTragedy, financial ruin]
  • A. familyLossEvent
    Indicates an event in which a person experiences the loss or death of a family member.
  • B. trauma chosen
    Indicates that an entity has experienced a deeply distressing or harmful event or series of events that cause lasting psychological or emotional impact.
  • C. otherMajorTragedy
    Indicates that the subject experienced or was involved in a significant tragic event other than the primary or most notable tragedy under consideration.
  • D. hasTragicPast
    Indicates that an entity has experienced a significantly sorrowful or traumatic history that influences its present state or characterization.
  • E. mourningCause
    Indicates that one entity is in a state of mourning specifically because of the other entity, which is the cause or reason for the grief.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eeb319007081909642b414b114b35a completed April 27, 2026, 12:51 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6247480cc8190a887eedaeb94615c completed May 2, 2026, 4:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f623a7539c8190b71797f583da9f63 completed May 2, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 1:12 a.m.