Triple
T26487617
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ray family of Bengal |
E664865
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPatrilinealDescendant |
P36141
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Satyajit Ray |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Satyajit Ray | Statement: [Ray family of Bengal, hasPatrilinealDescendant, Satyajit Ray]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPatrilinealDescendant Context triple: [Ray family of Bengal, hasPatrilinealDescendant, Satyajit Ray]
-
A.
hasGrandchildOfPatriarch
Indicates that one entity is a grandchild of a specified patriarch in a family or lineage relationship.
-
B.
hasDescendantPeople
chosen
Indicates that one entity has other people as its descendants in a genealogical or lineage-based relationship.
-
C.
hasPatrilinealOrigin
Indicates that something originates from or is derived through the male (father’s) ancestral line.
-
D.
hasMatrilinealConnection
Indicates a relationship where one entity is connected to another through a line of descent traced exclusively through female ancestors.
-
E.
paternalGrandchildOf
Indicates that one entity is the grandchild of another through the latter’s son (i.e., via the paternal line).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee883bc85481909885f92415cbce33 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6ffbad8848190867c2988c0ceb84f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6fc53f4f881908dcc698687bbb64d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:42 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 12:31 a.m.