Triple

T26487278
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Vaisigano E664855 entity
Predicate usesTraditionalSystem P164841 FINISHED
Object faamatai (chiefly system) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: faamatai (chiefly system) | Statement: [Vaisigano, usesTraditionalSystem, faamatai (chiefly system)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesTraditionalSystem
Context triple: [Vaisigano, usesTraditionalSystem, faamatai (chiefly system)]
  • A. isTraditional
    Indicates that something adheres to long-established customs, practices, or norms rather than modern or innovative ones.
  • B. isTraditionalInCountry
    Indicates that something is customary, long-established, or commonly practiced within a particular country.
  • C. usesTraditionalDecoration
    Indicates that an entity employs customary or historically established decorative styles or motifs in its design or presentation.
  • D. hasTraditionalFeatures
    Indicates that something possesses characteristics or attributes commonly associated with established traditions or customary practices.
  • E. settingTraditional
    Indicates that something is situated or occurs within a traditional setting, context, or environment.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee883bc85481909885f92415cbce33 completed April 26, 2026, 9:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f650fc44e48190bc0e0a935eac62a6 completed May 2, 2026, 7:31 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f64cab1f648190a2a9460690d18a37 completed May 2, 2026, 7:12 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f650c466b881908954e43bfebae8a4 completed May 2, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 12:31 a.m.