Triple
T26458209
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Olympia beer |
E665550
|
entity |
| Predicate | brandingEmphasizes |
P14764
|
FINISHED |
| Object | heritage |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: heritage | Statement: [Olympia beer, brandingEmphasizes, heritage]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: brandingEmphasizes Context triple: [Olympia beer, brandingEmphasizes, heritage]
-
A.
brandingNote
Indicates that an entity has an associated note or comment specifically about its branding, such as style, usage, or presentation guidelines.
-
B.
brandingFeature
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as a branding-related characteristic, element, or attribute that helps define or distinguish another entity’s brand identity.
-
C.
brandingStyle
Indicates the specific visual and stylistic approach used to represent a brand’s identity.
-
D.
brandingAuthority
Indicates that one entity has the recognized power or right to define, control, or approve the branding (name, logo, identity, or brand usage) of another entity or product.
-
E.
brandingMeaning
Indicates the conceptual message, values, or identity that a brand is intended to convey or represent.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee883e812c8190a9b5a9cdb87fee5e |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f61291b9588190931535163a538686 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:04 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f60b89cc048190a9feb24466006be0 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 12:10 a.m.