Triple
T26442625
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pami |
E665128
|
entity |
| Predicate | inscriptionsAttestedIn |
P156954
|
FINISHED |
| Object | hieroglyphic inscriptions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: hieroglyphic inscriptions | Statement: [Pami, inscriptionsAttestedIn, hieroglyphic inscriptions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: inscriptionsAttestedIn Context triple: [Pami, inscriptionsAttestedIn, hieroglyphic inscriptions]
-
A.
attestedInInscriptions
chosen
Indicates that evidence for the entity is documented or recorded in one or more inscriptions.
-
B.
inscriptionsFoundAt
Indicates that inscriptions are discovered or located at a particular place or site.
-
C.
notableInscriptionBy
Indicates that an inscription of particular note or significance on an entity was created, authored, or carved by a specified agent.
-
D.
mentionedInInscription
Indicates that an entity is referenced or named within a specific inscription or inscribed text.
-
E.
commonlyInscribedIn
Indicates that something is typically written, carved, or engraved onto a particular surface, object, or medium.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee883c851881909e2ab04efbb3c5fe |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f612607c388190ab61d1ac7d18e08d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:04 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f611a9272881909093360472be832c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 11:59 p.m.