Triple
T26423195
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Foss Barrier |
E664296
|
entity |
| Predicate | underwentUpgradeAfter |
P170349
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2015–2016 Yorkshire floods |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2015–2016 Yorkshire floods | Statement: [Foss Barrier, underwentUpgradeAfter, 2015–2016 Yorkshire floods]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: underwentUpgradeAfter Context triple: [Foss Barrier, underwentUpgradeAfter, 2015–2016 Yorkshire floods]
-
A.
underwentUpgrade
Indicates that an entity has experienced an improvement or enhancement process that changed it to a newer or more advanced state.
-
B.
wasUpgradedFor
Indicates that one entity was improved, enhanced, or updated specifically to serve, benefit, or be compatible with another entity.
-
C.
hasUpgrade
Indicates that one entity possesses, includes, or is associated with an improved or enhanced version of another entity.
-
D.
upgradedBy
Indicates that an entity has been improved, enhanced, or moved to a higher version or level as a result of actions performed by another entity.
-
E.
upgradeOf
Indicates that one entity is a newer, improved, or more advanced version of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee883a04ec81908883c4559f8c7e24 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f69063edbc81909e7735954aabee0b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f68b78f29481908cc8f390496dee97 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:40 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f68f6584a88190a8c4d95c0c84bee9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 11:44 p.m.