Triple

T26418838
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Red Ant Records E664174 entity
Predicate releasedAlbumsFor P165347 FINISHED
Object Cheap Trick NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cheap Trick | Statement: [Red Ant Records, releasedAlbumsFor, Cheap Trick]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: releasedAlbumsFor
Context triple: [Red Ant Records, releasedAlbumsFor, Cheap Trick]
  • A. releasedMusicBy
    Indicates that a musical work (such as a song, album, or EP) was issued or made publicly available by a particular artist or musical act.
  • B. hasDiscographyWith
    Indicates a relationship where two or more musical entities are associated through a shared or jointly produced discography.
  • C. hasAlbumRelease
    Indicates that an entity (typically an artist or band) has released a specific music album.
  • D. hasDiscographyUnderName
    Indicates that an entity has released or published a body of recorded works (a discography) using a specified name or alias.
  • E. releasedDebutAlbumFor
    Indicates that an entity (such as a record label or distributor) was responsible for releasing another entity’s debut music album.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee883a04ec81908883c4559f8c7e24 completed April 26, 2026, 9:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f658a91ba0819084fbe3dd8a09f7cd completed May 2, 2026, 8:03 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6575ba12081909396036f78757a76 completed May 2, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f657f2c8b08190bfeb3173ef78207d completed May 2, 2026, 8 p.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 11:42 p.m.