Triple

T26408555
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject NIST E663895 entity
Predicate AESDesignBasis P160521 FINISHED
Object subset of Rijndael with 128-bit block size LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: subset of Rijndael with 128-bit block size | Statement: [NIST, AESDesignBasis, subset of Rijndael with 128-bit block size]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: AESDesignBasis
Context triple: [NIST, AESDesignBasis, subset of Rijndael with 128-bit block size]
  • A. isDesignedAs
    Indicates that something has been intentionally created or configured to serve as or function in the role of something else.
  • B. basedOnDesignBy
    Indicates that something is created, developed, or structured according to the design conceived or produced by a specified entity.
  • C. designStandardizedIn
    Indicates that something is designed according to the rules, formats, or specifications defined within a particular standard or standardization framework.
  • D. testedDesignFeature
    Indicates that a specific design feature has been subjected to a test or evaluation process.
  • E. hasDesignIntent
    Indicates that one entity embodies or reflects the planned purpose, function, or conceptual intent defined by another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee883931888190901be96d75ee23cc completed April 26, 2026, 9:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f610faa77081908956b6e8b5b1570c completed May 2, 2026, 2:58 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f5f800fa9c8190aab0962669fde8ac completed May 2, 2026, 1:11 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6018ceb1c8190a6a5f84071659a96 completed May 2, 2026, 1:52 p.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 11:36 p.m.