Triple
T26408521
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Whirlpool |
E663894
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesKeyScheduleLike |
P160520
|
FINISHED |
| Object | AES-like key schedule |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: AES-like key schedule | Statement: [Whirlpool, usesKeyScheduleLike, AES-like key schedule]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesKeyScheduleLike Context triple: [Whirlpool, usesKeyScheduleLike, AES-like key schedule]
-
A.
supportsPrecomputedKeySchedule
Indicates that an entity is capable of using or handling a cryptographic key schedule that has been computed in advance rather than generating it on the fly.
-
B.
usesKeyDependentSBoxes
Indicates that the cryptographic construction employs S-boxes whose behavior or mapping depends on the value of the secret key.
-
C.
supportsKeyWhitening
Indicates that one entity provides or enables key whitening functionality for another entity or cryptographic process.
-
D.
keyExpansion
Indicates the process of deriving a set of subkeys from an original key for use in a cryptographic algorithm.
-
E.
usesSBoxes
Indicates that one entity employs substitution boxes (S-boxes) as part of its operation or implementation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee883931888190901be96d75ee23cc |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f610faa77081908956b6e8b5b1570c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f5f800fa9c8190aab0962669fde8ac |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6018ceb1c8190a6a5f84071659a96 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:52 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 11:36 p.m.