Triple
T26408516
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Whirlpool |
E663894
|
entity |
| Predicate | hashFamily |
P160519
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Whirlpool family |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Whirlpool family | Statement: [Whirlpool, hashFamily, Whirlpool family]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hashFamily Context triple: [Whirlpool, hashFamily, Whirlpool family]
-
A.
hashFunction
Indicates a relationship where an input value is transformed into a fixed-size output (hash) according to a specific deterministic hashing algorithm.
-
B.
algorithmFamily
Indicates that one algorithm belongs to, or is categorized under, a broader family or class of related algorithms.
-
C.
inKeyFamilyOf
Indicates that one musical key belongs to the same key family (e.g., closely related by key signature or tonal center) as another key.
-
D.
syntaxFamily
Indicates that two linguistic elements share a common syntactic type, pattern, or structural classification within a grammar system.
-
E.
typeFamily
Indicates that one entity is classified as a family-related type or belongs to a family category in relation to another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee883931888190901be96d75ee23cc |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f610faa77081908956b6e8b5b1570c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f5f800fa9c8190aab0962669fde8ac |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6018ceb1c8190a6a5f84071659a96 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:52 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 11:36 p.m.