Triple
T26399386
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IPFIX |
E663657
|
entity |
| Predicate | collectingProcessDefinedInRFC |
P83873
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 7011 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 7011 | Statement: [IPFIX, collectingProcessDefinedInRFC, RFC 7011]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: collectingProcessDefinedInRFC Context triple: [IPFIX, collectingProcessDefinedInRFC, RFC 7011]
-
A.
accountingDefinedInRFC
Indicates that the accounting mechanism or specification is formally defined or described within a particular RFC (Request for Comments) document.
-
B.
documentedProcess
Indicates that a process has been formally recorded, described, or specified in documentation.
-
C.
hasRFC
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with, described by, or defined in a specific RFC (Request for Comments) document.
-
D.
definesProcessFor
Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes the process or procedure to be used for another entity.
-
E.
originalRfc
Indicates that something is the initial or authoritative RFC (Request for Comments) document from which a specification, standard, or later revision originates.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee883823988190b418b111be28a44a |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f69383222c81909d8baa04129d5c81 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f690eb1e948190aab41a89969519a5 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:03 a.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 11:30 p.m.