Triple
T26399385
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IPFIX |
E663657
|
entity |
| Predicate | exportingProcessDefinedInRFC |
P83873
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 7011 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 7011 | Statement: [IPFIX, exportingProcessDefinedInRFC, RFC 7011]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: exportingProcessDefinedInRFC Context triple: [IPFIX, exportingProcessDefinedInRFC, RFC 7011]
-
A.
originalRfc
Indicates that something is the initial or authoritative RFC (Request for Comments) document from which a specification, standard, or later revision originates.
-
B.
exportedTo
Indicates that goods, services, or resources are sent out from one entity or region to another for trade or sale.
-
C.
exportedAs
Indicates that something is made available or delivered to an external destination under a specified name, format, or representation.
-
D.
exportedVia
Indicates that something is sent out or made available to an external destination through a specified medium, channel, or mechanism.
-
E.
hasRFC
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with, described by, or defined in a specific RFC (Request for Comments) document.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee883823988190b418b111be28a44a |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f610f2c09c8190849494490f255758 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f602d2ec748190ae95154f34c7878f |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 11:30 p.m.