Triple
T26399383
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IPFIX |
E663657
|
entity |
| Predicate | configurationModelDefinedInRFC |
P83873
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 6615 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 6615 | Statement: [IPFIX, configurationModelDefinedInRFC, RFC 6615]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: configurationModelDefinedInRFC Context triple: [IPFIX, configurationModelDefinedInRFC, RFC 6615]
-
A.
configurationProtocol
Indicates the protocol or method used to configure or set up a system, device, or component.
-
B.
hasRFC
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with, described by, or defined in a specific RFC (Request for Comments) document.
-
C.
MOBIKEDefinedInRFC
Indicates that the MOBIKE protocol or mechanism is specified or formally described within a particular RFC document.
-
D.
protocolDefined
Indicates that a specific protocol formally specifies or governs the behavior, format, or interaction associated with the related entities.
-
E.
deprecatedInRFC
Indicates that a specification, feature, or practice has been formally marked as deprecated within a particular RFC document.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee883823988190b418b111be28a44a |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f61f12b0f08190bc4a16907941864c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f61b3a8ae0819090189fbd8eb19f2f |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 11:30 p.m.