Triple
T26399297
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 5426 |
E663655
|
entity |
| Predicate | definesTransportFor |
P175205
|
FINISHED |
| Object | syslog |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: syslog | Statement: [RFC 5426, definesTransportFor, syslog]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: definesTransportFor Context triple: [RFC 5426, definesTransportFor, syslog]
-
A.
isTransport
Indicates that one entity serves as a means or method for conveying or carrying another entity from one place to another.
-
B.
transportInterface
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as the medium or mechanism through which another entity is transported or conveyed.
-
C.
transportFor
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as the means or service used to move another entity from one place to another.
-
D.
usesTransport
Indicates that an entity employs or relies on a particular mode or means of transportation to move from one place to another.
-
E.
transportAgnostic
Indicates that the relationship or action is independent of, and unaffected by, the specific transport mechanism or communication channel used.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee883823988190b418b111be28a44a |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6cee547108190ad3bc84297d8f516 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:28 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6cc1188708190b8f0f56e595e6057 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:16 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6cee3604c81908a07eade2f39064e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:28 a.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 11:30 p.m.