Triple
T26399151
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | VRRP |
E663651
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsOwnerRouterConcept |
P20012
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [VRRP, supportsOwnerRouterConcept, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsOwnerRouterConcept Context triple: [VRRP, supportsOwnerRouterConcept, true]
-
A.
ownerRouterDefinition
Indicates that an entity serves as the router or routing definition responsible for directing or managing requests on behalf of an owning entity.
-
B.
supportsRouting
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides the capability to determine and direct paths or routes for another entity’s traffic, requests, or messages.
-
C.
ownerOfRouteSegments
Indicates that an entity holds ownership or control over specific route segments within a network or pathway.
-
D.
hasInfrastructureOwnerType
Indicates the type or category of entity that owns or is responsible for a given piece of infrastructure.
-
E.
hasInfrastructureOwner
Indicates that one entity owns or is responsible for the infrastructure associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee883823988190b418b111be28a44a |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe91383a1c81909266e40c3c3ede6c |
completed | May 9, 2026, 1:43 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe8fde094081908f0f121664fbb5c7 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 1:37 a.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 11:30 p.m.