Triple
T26377845
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | OEM |
E660946
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayOutsource |
P139637
|
FINISHED |
| Object | component manufacturing |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: component manufacturing | Statement: [OEM, mayOutsource, component manufacturing]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayOutsource Context triple: [OEM, mayOutsource, component manufacturing]
-
A.
allowedContractingOut
chosen
Indicates that one party is permitted to delegate or outsource a contractual obligation or service to another party under the terms of an agreement.
-
B.
contractingOutVia
Indicates that one party delegates or outsources a task, service, or responsibility to another party through a contractual arrangement.
-
C.
mayApprove
Indicates that an entity has the authority or permission to approve another entity or action, but is not required to do so.
-
D.
mayContractWith
Indicates that one entity is permitted or authorized to enter into a contractual agreement with another entity.
-
E.
mayReject
Indicates that one entity has the authority or option to refuse, decline, or not accept another entity or proposal.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee812a698881908d6a58265995fa39 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f61071a4c4819090729e0c9789cf21 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f5f800fa9c8190aab0962669fde8ac |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 11:02 p.m.