Triple
T26377564
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Acer Swift |
E660940
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasProcessorOption |
P83886
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Intel Core processors |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Intel Core processors | Statement: [Acer Swift, hasProcessorOption, Intel Core processors]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasProcessorOption Context triple: [Acer Swift, hasProcessorOption, Intel Core processors]
-
A.
hasBuiltInProcessor
Indicates that one entity inherently contains an integrated processor as a built-in component rather than relying on an external processing unit.
-
B.
hasPackageOption
chosen
Indicates that an entity offers or is associated with a particular package option as one of its selectable configurations or variants.
-
C.
hasProcess
Indicates that an entity is associated with, participates in, or is characterized by a particular process.
-
D.
hasKernelConfigOption
Indicates that a system, kernel, or software component includes or is configured with a specific kernel configuration option.
-
E.
supportsProcessorFamily
Indicates that one entity (such as hardware or software) is compatible with and can operate using a specified processor family.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee812a698881908d6a58265995fa39 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcda3699948190adb57625bae08091 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcd8fd16d08190b0aca6e19a632e99 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:25 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 11:02 p.m.