Triple

T26355479
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Again (Lenny Kravitz music video) E663035 entity
Predicate complementsThemesOf P162 FINISHED
Object emotional longing LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: emotional longing | Statement: [Again (Lenny Kravitz music video), complementsThemesOf, emotional longing]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: complementsThemesOf
Context triple: [Again (Lenny Kravitz music video), complementsThemesOf, emotional longing]
  • A. complements chosen
    Indicates that one entity enhances, completes, or improves another by providing qualities or functions that fit well together.
  • B. followsInTheme
    Indicates that one element continues or succeeds another while maintaining the same theme or thematic context.
  • C. themeFor
    Indicates that something serves as the central subject, topic, or focus for another thing (such as an event, work, or activity).
  • D. themedAs
    Indicates that something is characterized, styled, or organized according to a particular theme or motif.
  • E. reflectsOnTheme
    Indicates that one entity critically considers, analyzes, or comments on the theme expressed or embodied by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee8130fc44819094e5ab1da201cd7b completed April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6562fd3488190be1acd8c526a28d2 completed May 2, 2026, 7:53 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f651a731508190bb0c8c2462eba224 completed May 2, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 10:48 p.m.