Triple
T26349247
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Osmanlı'da Millet Sistemi |
E662857
|
entity |
| Predicate | eleAldığıKavram |
P95563
|
FINISHED |
| Object | millet kavramı |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: millet kavramı | Statement: [Osmanlı'da Millet Sistemi, eleAldığıKavram, millet kavramı]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: eleAldığıKavram Context triple: [Osmanlı'da Millet Sistemi, eleAldığıKavram, millet kavramı]
-
A.
notionOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity represents, expresses, or embodies the concept or idea of another entity.
-
B.
éA
Indicates a directed association or influence from one entity toward another, where the first entity acts upon, affects, or is related to the second in a specified manner.
-
C.
isConceptualizedAs
Indicates that one entity is mentally represented, interpreted, or understood in terms of another entity.
-
D.
basingConcept
Indicates that one concept serves as the foundational basis or underlying rationale for another concept.
-
E.
introducedConcept
Indicates that one entity is responsible for presenting, defining, or bringing a new concept into use or awareness for another entity or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee8130fc44819094e5ab1da201cd7b |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f60fa9dc9c8190b2501a3bc23eabfe |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f5f800fa9c8190aab0962669fde8ac |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 10:44 p.m.