Triple
T26347470
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lotus Organizer |
E662813
|
entity |
| Predicate | userInterfaceMetaphor |
P82532
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ring binder |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ring binder | Statement: [Lotus Organizer, userInterfaceMetaphor, ring binder]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: userInterfaceMetaphor Context triple: [Lotus Organizer, userInterfaceMetaphor, ring binder]
-
A.
userInterface
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as the interface or interaction layer through which a user engages with another system, service, or resource.
-
B.
userInterfaceSimilarTo
Indicates that one user interface resembles or closely matches another in appearance, layout, or interaction style.
-
C.
visualMetaphor
chosen
Indicates a relationship where one entity conceptually represents or explains another through a visual analogy or symbolic imagery.
-
D.
interactionMechanism
Indicates the process or means by which one entity affects, influences, or interacts with another.
-
E.
previousUserInterface
Indicates that one user interface precedes another in time or version within a sequence of interfaces.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee8130fc44819094e5ab1da201cd7b |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f60fa7f0588190988ce7483ab7523d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f5f800fa9c8190aab0962669fde8ac |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 10:43 p.m.