Triple
T26345735
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | CSS filters |
E662772
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsTransitions |
P196974
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [CSS filters, supportsTransitions, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsTransitions Context triple: [CSS filters, supportsTransitions, true]
-
A.
supportsTransitionTo
Indicates that one state, condition, or entity enables or is compatible with moving or changing to another state, condition, or entity.
-
B.
supportsMigrationOf
Indicates that one entity enables, facilitates, or is compatible with the migration or transfer of another entity from one environment, system, or context to another.
-
C.
supportsTransactions
Indicates that one entity provides the capability for another entity to perform or manage transactions reliably.
-
D.
supportsFeature
Indicates that one entity provides, enables, or is compatible with a particular feature or capability of another.
-
E.
supportedIn
Indicates that one entity is valid, applicable, or functionally enabled within the context, environment, platform, or scope defined by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee81304194819092e20e0fae3aee07 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe72dca2f08190beff17de3d2aada6 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 11:33 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe70bca8d08190b810e1e616ceac44 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 11:24 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fe72db8810819089e397961b8ead7a |
completed | May 8, 2026, 11:33 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 10:42 p.m.