Triple

T26341854
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Irene Cassini E662666 entity
Predicate hasRelationshipToGenetics P194893 FINISHED
Object genetically engineered LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: genetically engineered | Statement: [Irene Cassini, hasRelationshipToGenetics, genetically engineered]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRelationshipToGenetics
Context triple: [Irene Cassini, hasRelationshipToGenetics, genetically engineered]
  • A. hasGeneticAffiliation
    Indicates that one entity is genetically related or affiliated with another, such as sharing ancestry, lineage, or genetic characteristics.
  • B. hasGeneticComponent
    Indicates that the associated condition, trait, or phenomenon is influenced or determined in part by genetic factors.
  • C. geneticRelation
    Indicates that two entities are connected through a hereditary or familial genetic relationship.
  • D. hasGeneticEvidence
    Indicates that there is genetic data or analysis supporting the existence, validity, or nature of the specified relationship or association between entities.
  • E. proposesGeneticRelationshipBetween
    Indicates that one entity puts forward or suggests the existence of a genetic relationship between two or more entities.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee81304194819092e20e0fae3aee07 completed April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd8e5f7c4c8190ab8e2f2a7bb1bd79 completed May 8, 2026, 7:18 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd8d8a16f08190b9e880901bfa44fe completed May 8, 2026, 7:15 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fd8e5e9ca48190890a2caddc1f9f5c completed May 8, 2026, 7:18 a.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 10:39 p.m.