Triple
T26341799
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Vincent Freeman |
E662665
|
entity |
| Predicate | assumesAlias |
P160425
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jerome Morrow |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jerome Morrow | Statement: [Vincent Freeman, assumesAlias, Jerome Morrow]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: assumesAlias Context triple: [Vincent Freeman, assumesAlias, Jerome Morrow]
-
A.
usesAliasFor
Indicates that one entity employs an alternative name or identifier to refer to another entity.
-
B.
usesAliasTo
Indicates that one entity employs an alternative name or identifier to refer to or represent another entity.
-
C.
isAliasOf
Indicates that one name, label, or identifier refers to the same entity as another.
-
D.
usesAliasWith
Indicates that one entity employs or operates under an alternative name or identifier in association with another entity.
-
E.
awareOfAlias
Indicates that one entity knows or recognizes an alternative name or identifier (alias) used for another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee81304194819092e20e0fae3aee07 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f60fa2af708190a41199a1bd022ed2 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f5f800fa9c8190aab0962669fde8ac |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6018ceb1c8190a6a5f84071659a96 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:52 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 10:39 p.m.