Triple

T26324451
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Safad E662209 entity
Predicate hasNotableSynagogue P84438 FINISHED
Object Ari Ashkenazi Synagogue NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ari Ashkenazi Synagogue | Statement: [Safad, hasNotableSynagogue, Ari Ashkenazi Synagogue]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNotableSynagogue
Context triple: [Safad, hasNotableSynagogue, Ari Ashkenazi Synagogue]
  • A. hasSynagogueType
    Indicates the specific classification or type of synagogue associated with an entity.
  • B. hasNotableReligiousCommunity
    Indicates that an entity is known for having a significant or prominent religious community associated with it.
  • C. hasSynagogueHistory
    Indicates that there exists a historical relationship or record connecting an entity to a synagogue, such as past ownership, use, events, or significance.
  • D. mainSynagogue chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as the primary or principal synagogue associated with another entity (such as a place, community, or organization).
  • E. hasSynagogueUnion
    Indicates that there exists an organizational or formal union connecting one synagogue with another synagogue or group of synagogues.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee812e73048190aae587f1d51e5a06 completed April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd4d1854988190be093b103a681798 completed May 8, 2026, 2:40 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd4c8d1a188190897c24527337814a completed May 8, 2026, 2:38 a.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 10:30 p.m.