Triple

T26318516
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject FlashArray E662036 entity
Predicate dataProtectionFeature P160243 FINISHED
Object encryption at rest LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: encryption at rest | Statement: [FlashArray, dataProtectionFeature, encryption at rest]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dataProtectionFeature
Context triple: [FlashArray, dataProtectionFeature, encryption at rest]
  • A. dataProtectionFeature chosen
    Indicates a feature or mechanism designed to safeguard data from unauthorized access, alteration, loss, or misuse.
  • B. protectsFeature
    Indicates that one entity safeguards, preserves, or defends a particular feature or characteristic of another entity.
  • C. protectionType
    Indicates the kind or method of protection that is applied to or associated with an entity.
  • D. hasDataProtectionAuthority
    Indicates that an entity is subject to, overseen by, or associated with a specific data protection authority responsible for regulating its handling of personal data.
  • E. protectionPolicy
    Indicates that one entity establishes or enforces rules or measures to safeguard another entity from harm, loss, or risk.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee812e73048190aae587f1d51e5a06 completed April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f60f299fd0819089685b371ddfae1b completed May 2, 2026, 2:50 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f60b874cc88190a487230abb69efea completed May 2, 2026, 2:34 p.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 10:26 p.m.