Triple
T26318494
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | FlashArray |
E662036
|
entity |
| Predicate | softwareDefinedFeature |
P6774
|
FINISHED |
| Object | replication |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: replication | Statement: [FlashArray, softwareDefinedFeature, replication]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: softwareDefinedFeature Context triple: [FlashArray, softwareDefinedFeature, replication]
-
A.
developmentFeature
Indicates that one entity serves as a developmental feature, aspect, or component of another entity within a growth or improvement process.
-
B.
configurationFeatures
Indicates the specific options or characteristics that are enabled or defined within a particular configuration.
-
C.
designedFeature
Indicates that one entity is a feature or component intentionally planned, created, or specified by another entity as part of a design.
-
D.
technologicalFeature
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a specific technological capability, component, or functionality in relation to another entity.
-
E.
featureFlag
Indicates that a particular functionality or behavior is conditionally enabled or disabled for an entity based on a configurable flag.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee812e73048190aae587f1d51e5a06 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f60f299fd0819089685b371ddfae1b |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:50 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f602d2ec748190ae95154f34c7878f |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 10:26 p.m.