Triple
T2631354
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Doob–Meyer decomposition |
E59636
|
entity |
| Predicate | concludesExistenceOf |
P42357
|
FINISHED |
| Object | unique martingale part |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: unique martingale part | Statement: [Doob–Meyer decomposition, concludesExistenceOf, unique martingale part]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: concludesExistenceOf Context triple: [Doob–Meyer decomposition, concludesExistenceOf, unique martingale part]
-
A.
proposesExistenceOf
Indicates that one entity puts forward or suggests that another entity should exist or be brought into existence.
-
B.
concludes
Indicates that one entity brings something (such as an event, process, or discussion) to an end or reaches a final decision or judgment about it.
-
C.
concludedThat
Indicates that one entity has reached or stated a judgment, inference, or decision about a proposition or situation involving another entity.
-
D.
concludedBy
Indicates that an event, process, or state is brought to an end or finalized by a specific agent or entity.
-
E.
existsFor
Indicates that something is present, available, or holds true for a particular entity, context, or condition.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4ac8596c8190b34997e73d9e991c |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abdb0e7b888190bfa5d2e33f00ec0f |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abd810d7f481908e81c305772c4c14 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abdb0bf9b881908b239c1310c7bbf3 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:50 p.m.