Triple

T26304068
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Philip Bard E661632 entity
Predicate theoryChallenged P3648 FINISHED
Object James–Lange theory of emotion NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: James–Lange theory of emotion | Statement: [Philip Bard, theoryChallenged, James–Lange theory of emotion]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: theoryChallenged
Context triple: [Philip Bard, theoryChallenged, James–Lange theory of emotion]
  • A. contradictedTheory
    Indicates that one entity has presented evidence, arguments, or findings that oppose, challenge, or invalidate the theory proposed by another entity.
  • B. challengedConcept chosen
    Indicates that one entity has questioned, disputed, or called into doubt the validity, accuracy, or applicability of a particular concept.
  • C. rejectsTheory
    Indicates that one entity does not accept, endorse, or agree with a particular theory proposed or held by another entity.
  • D. doctrineChallenged
    Indicates that a particular doctrine, principle, or set of beliefs is being questioned, disputed, or formally contested.
  • E. theorized
    Indicates that one entity has proposed or developed a theoretical explanation or hypothesis about another entity or phenomenon.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee812dacfc81908484aade9120fba9 completed April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f60ee166a88190b3a02ec60e8479fe completed May 2, 2026, 2:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f602d2ec748190ae95154f34c7878f completed May 2, 2026, 1:57 p.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 10:17 p.m.