Triple
T26302706
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Goyaałé |
E661600
|
entity |
| Predicate | detainedAs |
P160226
|
FINISHED |
| Object | prisoner of war |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: prisoner of war | Statement: [Goyaałé, detainedAs, prisoner of war]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: detainedAs Context triple: [Goyaałé, detainedAs, prisoner of war]
-
A.
detainedBy
Indicates that an entity is being held in custody or confinement by another entity, typically an authority or controlling party.
-
B.
detainedFor
Indicates that one entity is being held in custody or confinement because of, or as a consequence of, another entity (such as a reason, charge, or event).
-
C.
detainedAfter
Indicates that one entity is held in custody or confinement following another specified event or action.
-
D.
detainsUnder
Indicates that one entity holds another in custody or confinement under a specific legal authority, provision, or condition.
-
E.
usedToDetain
Indicates that something serves or functioned as a means, tool, or facility for holding or confining someone against their will.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee812cd48c81908054068f545f0526 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f60eb396788190a225665a56568d2c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f5f7ff548c8190a23e98c5e66e0bc7 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f5ffc6268c8190b63f6360ebadab73 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:44 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 10:16 p.m.