Triple

T26298597
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pretty Boy E661485 entity
Predicate bearerNotableStyle P140235 FINISHED
Object defensive boxer LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: defensive boxer | Statement: [Pretty Boy, bearerNotableStyle, defensive boxer]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: bearerNotableStyle
Context triple: [Pretty Boy, bearerNotableStyle, defensive boxer]
  • A. notableStyleFeature
    Indicates that an entity possesses a distinctive stylistic characteristic or design element that is especially noteworthy or defining.
  • B. notableSubstyle
    Indicates that one style is a notable or distinct subcategory within another broader style.
  • C. hasNotableBearerStyle
    Indicates that a particular style, form, or variant is notably associated with a specific bearer (such as a person, group, or entity) as a distinguishing characteristic.
  • D. notableHolderFullStyle
    Indicates that a person is a notable holder of a title, position, or honor, expressed using their full formal style.
  • E. bearerStyleCharacteristic chosen
    Indicates that a bearer (such as a person or object) exhibits or is associated with a particular style-related characteristic.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee812cd48c81908054068f545f0526 completed April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f657f653448190a945b4751af8507d completed May 2, 2026, 8 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6575ba12081909396036f78757a76 completed May 2, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 10:14 p.m.