Triple
T26289753
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Maharashtra |
E661233
|
entity |
| Predicate | borderDisputeLegalArgument |
P180204
|
FINISHED |
| Object | linguistic majority principle for state boundaries |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: linguistic majority principle for state boundaries | Statement: [Maharashtra, borderDisputeLegalArgument, linguistic majority principle for state boundaries]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: borderDisputeLegalArgument Context triple: [Maharashtra, borderDisputeLegalArgument, linguistic majority principle for state boundaries]
-
A.
borderDisputeRelatedLanguage
Indicates a relationship where the language is associated with, used in, or relevant to a border dispute between entities.
-
B.
borderDisputeResolvedBy
Indicates that a previously contested border between entities has been settled or resolved through the specified agent, process, or agreement.
-
C.
borderDisputeConstitutionalProvisionInvoked
chosen
Indicates that a constitutional provision is cited or relied upon in the context of a border dispute between entities.
-
D.
borderDisputeCulturalAssertion
Indicates a situation where a border dispute is used or perceived as a means of asserting cultural identity, dominance, or heritage over a contested area.
-
E.
borderDisputesWith
Indicates that there are contested or unresolved boundary claims between two entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee812bbd448190be4d7478b057990a |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7626667f48190ad90867eb67ec582 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f76175d6608190b60b268e20f49ed9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:53 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 10:07 p.m.