Triple

T26289747
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Maharashtra E661233 entity
Predicate borderDisputeNegotiationChannel P180593 FINISHED
Object inter-state talks with Karnataka LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: inter-state talks with Karnataka | Statement: [Maharashtra, borderDisputeNegotiationChannel, inter-state talks with Karnataka]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: borderDisputeNegotiationChannel
Context triple: [Maharashtra, borderDisputeNegotiationChannel, inter-state talks with Karnataka]
  • A. borderDisputeResolvedBy
    Indicates that a previously contested border between entities has been settled or resolved through the specified agent, process, or agreement.
  • B. borderDisputeRelatedLanguage
    Indicates a relationship where the language is associated with, used in, or relevant to a border dispute between entities.
  • C. borderDisputesWith
    Indicates that there are contested or unresolved boundary claims between two entities.
  • D. borderSettlement
    Indicates that a settlement is located near or along a political or administrative border.
  • E. borderDisputeCulturalAssertion
    Indicates a situation where a border dispute is used or perceived as a means of asserting cultural identity, dominance, or heritage over a contested area.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee812bbd448190be4d7478b057990a completed April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7465687bc8190a9da44d62b634ed7 completed May 3, 2026, 12:57 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f743f4ceb08190a21fe7f4a99b166b completed May 3, 2026, 12:47 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f74654c09c819084879162eba9d641 completed May 3, 2026, 12:57 p.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 10:07 p.m.