Triple
T26289738
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Maharashtra |
E661233
|
entity |
| Predicate | borderDisputePoliticalImpact |
P179777
|
FINISHED |
| Object | recurring issue in state politics |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: recurring issue in state politics | Statement: [Maharashtra, borderDisputePoliticalImpact, recurring issue in state politics]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: borderDisputePoliticalImpact Context triple: [Maharashtra, borderDisputePoliticalImpact, recurring issue in state politics]
-
A.
borderDisputesWith
Indicates that there are contested or unresolved boundary claims between two entities.
-
B.
borderDisputeResolvedBy
Indicates that a previously contested border between entities has been settled or resolved through the specified agent, process, or agreement.
-
C.
borderDisputeCentralGovernmentRole
Indicates that the central government plays a role in managing, mediating, or influencing a border dispute between territorial entities.
-
D.
borderDisputeRelatedLanguage
Indicates a relationship where the language is associated with, used in, or relevant to a border dispute between entities.
-
E.
borderingStateInfluence
Indicates that one state exerts political, economic, social, or security-related influence on another state with which it shares a land or maritime border.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee812bbd448190be4d7478b057990a |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f727afd5d88190ad48735cd1b32787 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:47 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f72737c42c8190a3f781a5e98868ff |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:45 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f727ad9ff88190ba8069dd48b2e98f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:47 a.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 10:07 p.m.