Triple

T26289735
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Maharashtra E661233 entity
Predicate borderDisputeNature P42532 FINISHED
Object inter-state boundary dispute LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: inter-state boundary dispute | Statement: [Maharashtra, borderDisputeNature, inter-state boundary dispute]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: borderDisputeNature
Context triple: [Maharashtra, borderDisputeNature, inter-state boundary dispute]
  • A. borderDisputesWith
    Indicates that there are contested or unresolved boundary claims between two entities.
  • B. borderDisputeResolvedBy
    Indicates that a previously contested border between entities has been settled or resolved through the specified agent, process, or agreement.
  • C. frontierDispute chosen
    Indicates a conflict or disagreement between entities over the location, control, or status of a shared boundary or border.
  • D. hasDisputedMaritimeBoundary
    Indicates that there is an unresolved or contested maritime boundary claim between two or more entities.
  • E. associatedTerritoryDispute
    Indicates that there is a territorial dispute or contested claim connected to the referenced entity or relationship.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee812bbd448190be4d7478b057990a completed April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f71f8ee0688190bd025f27993452d3 completed May 3, 2026, 10:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f71cc405c08190863565609a4c8499 completed May 3, 2026, 10 a.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 10:07 p.m.