Triple
T262888
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Old Catholicism |
E5787
|
entity |
| Predicate | retains |
P6164
|
FINISHED |
| Object | apostolic succession |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: apostolic succession | Statement: [Old Catholicism, retains, apostolic succession]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: retains Context triple: [Old Catholicism, retains, apostolic succession]
-
A.
retained
chosen
Indicates that one entity keeps possession, control, or continued engagement of another entity over a period of time.
-
B.
reserves
Indicates that an entity has arranged in advance to hold or secure something for future use or access.
-
C.
holding
Indicates that one entity is physically grasping, carrying, or keeping another entity in its possession or control.
-
D.
recall
Indicates that an entity retrieves or brings back into awareness information, events, or items that were previously known, experienced, or stored.
-
E.
held
Indicates that one entity physically grasped, carried, or kept another entity in its possession or control.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a258dd8ea08190ac554a1cc8dfd8c3 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:54 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25d8c7f448190af9145256f994177 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b6e07748190834022a65ba6d803 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:55 a.m.