Triple

T26273398
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Zack Siler E660493 entity
Predicate relationshipStatusByEnd P137672 FINISHED
Object in a romantic relationship with Laney Boggs LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: in a romantic relationship with Laney Boggs | Statement: [Zack Siler, relationshipStatusByEnd, in a romantic relationship with Laney Boggs]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipStatusByEnd
Context triple: [Zack Siler, relationshipStatusByEnd, in a romantic relationship with Laney Boggs]
  • A. relationshipEnd
    Indicates that a previously existing relationship between entities has been terminated or has come to an end.
  • B. formerRelationshipStatus
    Indicates that a relationship between entities existed in the past but no longer holds in the present.
  • C. relationshipOutcome
    Indicates the result or consequence that arises from a particular relationship between two or more entities.
  • D. stateOfRelations chosen
    Indicates the current nature or condition of the relationship between two or more entities, such as whether it is friendly, hostile, neutral, or otherwise characterized.
  • E. hasMaritalStatusAtEnd
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific marital status at the end of a given period, event, or reference time.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ee812960d081909cff6085cc9fa3a6 completed April 26, 2026, 9:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe163a41a0819098403b470e327d29 completed May 8, 2026, 4:58 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe1358db5c819092570814a37ef5bd completed May 8, 2026, 4:46 p.m.
Created at: April 26, 2026, 9:53 p.m.