Triple
T26254961
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | PSL(2,ℤ/Nℤ) |
E656691
|
entity |
| Predicate | isNotSimpleFor |
P152467
|
FINISHED |
| Object | composite N in general |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: composite N in general | Statement: [PSL(2,ℤ/Nℤ), isNotSimpleFor, composite N in general]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isNotSimpleFor Context triple: [PSL(2,ℤ/Nℤ), isNotSimpleFor, composite N in general]
-
A.
isNonSimple
chosen
Indicates that the relationship or structure in question is not simple, typically meaning it has additional complexity, such as multiple components, repetitions, or self-intersections.
-
B.
isSimple
Indicates that something has a straightforward, uncomplicated nature or structure, lacking complexity or elaboration.
-
C.
hasComplex
Indicates that one entity possesses, is associated with, or is part of a larger composite structure or complex formed with another entity.
-
D.
hasComplexity
Indicates that something possesses a certain level or type of complexity, often in terms of structure, behavior, or difficulty.
-
E.
hasComplexification
Indicates that one entity is a more complex or elaborated version, form, or development of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5b4d25ac819086acb51184602576 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f60dcd2e688190b54e36b0ff0d9187 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f5f7ff548c8190a23e98c5e66e0bc7 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 9:08 p.m.