Triple
T26254938
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | T : z ↦ z + 1 |
E656690
|
entity |
| Predicate | extendsContinuouslyTo |
P162796
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ℍ ∪ {∞} |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ℍ ∪ {∞} | Statement: [T : z ↦ z + 1, extendsContinuouslyTo, ℍ ∪ {∞}]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: extendsContinuouslyTo
Context triple: [T : z ↦ z + 1, extendsContinuouslyTo, ℍ ∪ {∞}]
-
A.
continuesInto
Indicates that one entity extends forward in time, space, or sequence so that it directly proceeds into and forms a continuous progression with another entity.
-
B.
continuesFor
Indicates that an event, state, or process persists or remains in effect for a specified duration or period.
-
C.
continuityFrom
Indicates that one entity continues, extends, or proceeds directly from another in a seamless or unbroken manner.
-
D.
extendedIndefinitelyOn
Indicates that something was prolonged or continued without a specified end point in relation to something else.
-
E.
continuesToward
Indicates that an entity maintains its movement or progression in the direction of a specified target or destination.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ee5b4d25ac819086acb51184602576 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 6:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f62e4168a48190b45268f922780da6 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:02 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f62c15952881908a5ea0c25904afec |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:53 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f62d5268ac8190835dc7119353b840 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 4:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 26, 2026, 9:08 p.m.